The comments on that excellent post are illustrating what I think of as the "blind men with the elephant" problem. So many different kinds of academic institutions, large and small, public and private, well-funded and in-subscription-cancel-mode-every-year, tend to approach this topic as if their experience, mission, budget constraints, etc. are the norm.
What Rick described absolutely applies to my institution: small, public, with student fees providing an increasing share of our operating budget every year.


Melissa Belvadi
[log in to unmask]
Make an appointment: https://mbelvadi.youcanbook.me/

From: OpenCafe-l <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2025 10:51 AM
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [OPENCAFE-L] Opinion: Subscribe-to-Open Is Doomed. Here's Why.
 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of UPEI. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If you are uncertain, please use the Report Message button in Outlook and delete this email.


For those who might be interested, I've got a new piece up in the Scholarly Kitchen today, this one explaining my deep pessimism about the future of the subscribe-to-open OA publishing model. Comments are coming in thick and fast and the discussion has been really good so far, I think.

 

https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2025/08/18/subscribe-to-open-is-doomed-heres-why/

 

---

Rick Anderson

University Librarian

Brigham Young University

(801) 422-4301

[log in to unmask]

 



Access the OPENCAFE-L Home Page and Archives

To unsubscribe from OPENCAFE-L send an email to: [log in to unmask]



Access the OPENCAFE-L Home Page and Archives

To unsubscribe from OPENCAFE-L send an email to: [log in to unmask]