Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.BYU.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - OPENCAFE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

OPENCAFE-L Archives

OpenCafe-l

OPENCAFE-L@LISTSERV.BYU.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
OPENCAFE-L Home OPENCAFE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: [EXT] Re: [OPENCAFE-L] Legislative opposition to the Nelson Memo continues to fail to die...
From:
Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:33:54 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 kB) , text/html (15 kB)
A CC BY license (or its equivalent) permits the creation of derivative works without having to seek permission from the copyright holder. In other words, it expressly permits “modification without consent” (though whether this “harm[s]” the work’s “integrity” will vary by circumstance and will probably be a matter of opinion in many cases).

Of course, the Nelson Memo doesn’t require those kinds of licenses. It requires that publications based on federally-funded research be made “freely and publicly available by default,” but doesn’t specify what reuse rights must be licensed to the public. It does, however, leave the door open to agencies to impose those additional kinds of requirements, which I believe is what the Senate committee is raising concerns about. Its report directs OSTP to “clarify its guidance to agencies and instruct them not to limit grant recipients’ ability to copyright, freely license, or control their works.”

---
Rick Anderson
University Librarian
Brigham Young University
(801) 422-4301
[log in to unmask]


From: OpenCafe-l <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Ali Krzton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Ali Krzton <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Monday, August 19, 2024 at 10:23 AM
To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [OPENCAFE-L] [EXT] Re: [OPENCAFE-L] Legislative opposition to the Nelson Memo continues to fail to die...

Interesting language used in both reports: researchers should not have to release their work under licenses that could "harm its integrity or allow modification without consent".  What licenses do they mean, I wonder, and how would those licenses lead to such outcomes?  I'm thinking both "how could open licenses potentially lead to this" and also "what are the causal mechanisms from the standpoint of those concerned".
Best,
Ali Krzton
Research Data Management Librarian
Auburn University
________________________________
From: OpenCafe-l <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2024 11:04 AM
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [EXT] Re: [OPENCAFE-L] Legislative opposition to the Nelson Memo continues to fail to die...

CAUTION: Email Originated Outside of Auburn.

It’s the Senate and House Appropriations Committees, each of which has written a separate report expressing concern about implementation of the Nelson Memo.



Relevant section of the House committee report: https://www.congress.gov/118/crpt/hrpt582/CRPT-118hrpt582.pdf#page=92



… and of the Senate committee report: https://www.congress.gov/118/crpt/srpt198/CRPT-118srpt198.pdf#page=149



---

Rick Anderson

University Librarian

Brigham Young University

(801) 422-4301

[log in to unmask]





From: Jim O'Donnell <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Monday, August 19, 2024 at 10:00 AM
To: Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [OPENCAFE-L] Legislative opposition to the Nelson Memo continues to fail to die...



Rick, where do you think this opposition is coming from?  “Appropriators” is a very anonymous screen behind which is … ?



Jim O’Donnell

ASU

On Monday, August 19, 2024, Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

https://ww2.aip.org/fyi/lawmakers-raise-new-licensing-concerns-over-white-house-open-access-mandate



Pull quote: “appropriators in both chambers of Congress have advanced legislation that would block federal agencies from limiting authors’ ability to choose how to license their work.”



---

Rick Anderson

University Librarian

Brigham Young University

(801) 422-4301

[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>





________________________________

Access the OPENCAFE-L Home Page and Archives<https://listserv.byu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=OPENCAFE-L>

To unsubscribe from OPENCAFE-L send an email to: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

________________________________

Access the OPENCAFE-L Home Page and Archives<https://listserv.byu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=OPENCAFE-L>

To unsubscribe from OPENCAFE-L send an email to: [log in to unmask]

________________________________

Access the OPENCAFE-L Home Page and Archives<https://listserv.byu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=OPENCAFE-L>

To unsubscribe from OPENCAFE-L send an email to: [log in to unmask]

########################################################################

Access the OPENCAFE-L Home Page and Archives:
https://listserv.byu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=OPENCAFE-L

To unsubscribe from OPENCAFE-L send an email to:
[log in to unmask]

########################################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.BYU.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV