| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:44:49 +1300 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------3W0s5PWUUfG0e65gyZRJXIdF" |
| Comments: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
hi
From my perspective, an overlay is essentially the 'C' in
PRC...overlays sit nicely in a world where the journal has been
deconstructed into its consistent parts. P= publish as we see with
preprint servers R = review as we see with many review communities C =
curate the assemblage of materials
I think the 'sense' of 'C' (overlays) is starting to 'make more sense'
(if you will) for folks as the P & R practices are becoming more popular.
adam
On 2/7/24 05:55, Shamsi Brinn wrote:
> Hi Jean-Claude, great suggestion. I have in fact spoken to several
> people from Episciences and the conversations were great, very
> informative. I am asking naive questions on purpose because I am just
> very curious what other's opinions on overlays are and if they have
> made an impact in your world. Do you read any overlay journals?
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 11:42 AM Jean-Claude Guédon
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> You might want to contact the people at episcience whichislisted
> in the Rousi-Laakso paper you referenced.
> https://www.episciences.org/ . They know a lot about this kind of
> publishing nd are doing high-quality publishing in this fashion.
>
> Jean-Claude Guédon
>
> On 2024-02-06 09:53, Shamsi Brinn wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I have been eagerly reading the informative discussions around
>> the Nelson Memo and a recent thread about SciElo and open access
>> in low and middle income countries. I am learning a lot.
>>
>> I wanted to open up a discussion about overlay journals. They
>> appear to be a promising alternative model for peer-reviewed open
>> access publishing, but they have not taken off. Have you heard of
>> overlay journals? What do you think of them? What is blocking
>> them from widespread use?
>> at episcience
>> If you have not heard of them but are curious this interesting
>> paper from Rousi and Laakso has a nice overview:
>> https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221125208
>>
>> Thanks for your thoughts,
>> -Shamsi
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Access the OPENCAFE-L Home Page and Archives
>> <https://listserv.byu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=OPENCAFE-L>
>>
>> Unsubscribe from the OPENCAFE-L List
>> <https://listserv.byu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?TICKET=NzM4OTUyIGplYW4uY2xhdWRlLmd1ZWRvbkBVTU9OVFJFQUwuQ0EgT1BFTkNBRkUtTJrUaktGW0ch&c=SIGNOFF>
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Access the OPENCAFE-L Home Page and Archives
> <https://listserv.byu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=OPENCAFE-L>
>
> Unsubscribe from the OPENCAFE-L List
> <https://listserv.byu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?TICKET=NzM4OTUyIGFkYW1AQ09LTy5GT1VOREFUSU9OIE9QRU5DQUZFLUwgICO2ewNj1e1r&c=SIGNOFF>
>
>
########################################################################
Access the OPENCAFE-L Home Page and Archives:
https://listserv.byu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=OPENCAFE-L
Unsubscribe from the OPENCAFE-L List:
https://listserv.byu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=OPENCAFE-L
########################################################################
|
|
|